The Trump administration’s April 6 targeted missile strike on the Syrian airbase from which the chemical attack was launched, is not a reflection of any genuine concern for the Syrian people. It will not help the struggle against the Assad regime, ISIS and Al Qaida. Instead, this administration’s latest airstrikes are motivated by other aims.
According to Hadi Ghaemi, executive director of the Campaign for Human Rights in Iran, If Trump’s “executive order had been in effect in 2009, it would have prevented Iranian dissidents, including Nobel Peace Laureate Shirin Ebadi, from entering the United States to speak about the Islamic Republic’s violent repression of pro-democracy protesters who disputed the results of the presidential election that year. . .This order has left those Iranians most vulnerable to persecution, at the mercy of the Islamic Republic,” Below is the text of a press release from the Campaign for Human Rights in Iran.
Arash Sadeghi started his hunger strike on October 24, 2016 after his wife, Golrokh Ebrahimi-Iraei was sentenced to six years in prison for writing an unpublished story about the barbaric practice of stoning women. He ended his hunger strike on January 3, 2017 after Golrokh was given a prison furlough. In this open letter to his supporters he states: “the issue is not only my wife Golrokh Iraei as an individual and as my wife. She is the symbol of all the girls, women and even men in this country whose basic human rights are being violated and have become innocent victims.”
The inaction of the majority of the global Left in face of the Syrian regime/Russia/Iran perpetrated massacre in Aleppo is the sign of a very deep problem. In this article, I will attempt to explore the roots of this problem in order to draw out some lessons about what socialists can do now. ( This article was originally published by the Alliance of Syrian and Iranian Socialists on December 6, 2016.)
Although Trump’s message has been against “big government,” in fact his economic plan which mainly consists of tax cuts for large companies and massive spending cuts in the public sector, does not contradict the rule of a strong state/army. His authoritarianism might be similar to what we have seen in emerging economies such as Russia and China during the past 25 years.